Page 33 - Elana Freeland - Under an Ionized Sky

ionospheric processes in the lower atmosphere, etc. Drawing powering ions from the upper into
the lower atmosphere was exactly what the 1980s SDI program lacked.

The heart of the program will be the development of a unique ionospheric heating capability to conduct the pioneering
experiments required to adequately assess the potential for exploiting ionospheric enhancement technology for DOD
(Dept. of Defense) purposes. . .[S]uch a research facility will provide the means for investigating the creation,
maintenance, and control of a large number and wide variety of ionospheric processes that, if exploited, could provide
significant operational capabilities and advantages over conventional C3 systems.
. . .By exploring the properties of the auroral ionosphere as an active, non-linear medium, the primary energy of
the HF transmitter which is confined to a frequency range of 2.8 to 10 MHz can be down-converted to infra-red and
visible photons. As a result, the HAARP HF transmitter can generate sources for remote sensing and communications
25
24
spanning sixteen decades in frequency. [Emphasis added.]
“Sixteen orders of magnitude” point to HAARP’s unique power for manifold operations. As
Jerry Smith (1950–2010) commented in HAARP: The Ultimate Weapon:

This shows the deliberate misdirection of the current HAARP literature, which does all it can to downplay the true
power of this transmitter in terms of what it can affect. By being able to rebroadcast anywhere in the non-ionizing
(non-radioactive) segment of the electromagnetic spectrum, with a potential re-radiated broadcast power equal to, if
not greater than, all the TV and radio stations of the world combined, the HAARP array is utterly in a class of its own.
Frankly, its potential exceeds the imaginations of many science fiction writers working today. 26

In summary, with 1.7 gigawatts (billions) ERP and a frequency range of 1–15MHz
27
(millions), HAARP was able to turn the electrojet into a virtual antenna with radio wave
“mirrors” (ionospheric lenses) for long-range, over-the-horizon HF/VHF/UHF operations. With
the lower atmosphere ionized, all the military had to do was tune the HAARP instrument with
one or two other radar beams at other longitudes / latitudes, lay “chaff” loaded with conductive
metal nanoparticulates, and whip up a hurricane, earthquake, drought, or flood—or even a
directed energy event like 9/11.
In Chemtrails, HAARP, and the Full Spectrum Dominance of Planet Earth, I discuss a few
such “acts of God.” Over the past two decades, hundreds of experiments have been conducted
under cover of “global warming” and “climate change.” For example, Hurricane Sandy on
October 29, 2012, a real Halloween superstorm that inflicted $71 billion in damage on the Ports
of New York and New Jersey and killed 159 people. Sandy’s size and path were “unusual”:

After moving north from the tropical waters where it spawned, Sandy turned out to sea before hooking back west,
growing in size and crashing head-on into the East Coast, gaining strength when it merged with an eastbound mid-
latitude storm. . .“These events are somewhat rare in occurrence, but they do exist in nature,” [William Lau, research
scientist at University of Maryland’s Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center and senior scientist emeritus at
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center] said. “While they’re turning about each other, they interact. One just took the
28
energy from the other.”

Sandy’s “turn out to sea” was to pick up more power from a storm system created in the
South Atlantic and pinned offshore for the occasion. Sandy provided the model for dozens of
generously funded simulations at NASA Goddard to study what thus far had been learned from
Project Stormfury—for example, how warmer ocean-generated storms are 50–160 percent more
destructive than Sandy. 29