Page 43 - Elana Freeland - Under an Ionized Sky
P. 43
74
such as the fibrous, sticky white mesh discovered in melting snow in Wisconsin. Analysis at
Northern Lake Services in Crandon, Wisconsin revealed that twenty-three of twenty-six elements
corresponded to what is found in unleached coal fly ash. Herndon asks:
So, how might one account for the strikingly different appearance of the fibrous mesh morphology if indeed it is, as
evidence indicates, essentially identical in composition to fly ash? 75
He then wonders if jet fuel combustion (pyrolysis) is responsible for these fibers, along with
environmentally destructive methylmercury (CH H ) and ozone-depleting chlorinated-
3 g
fluorinated hydrocarbons.
“DUMPING” VIA ENGINE AND WING PYLON DRAIN TUBES
In the Environmental Research Letter 4 (October – December 2009), “Modification of cirrus
clouds to reduce global warming,” two delivery mechanisms are pointed out, the first being jet
fuel and the second being injections into the hot engine exhaust:
Since commercial airliners routinely fly in the region where cold cirrus clouds exist, it is hoped that the seeding
material could either be (1) dissolved or suspended in their jet fuel and later burned with the fuel to create seeding
aerosol, or (2) injected into the hot engine exhaust, which should vaporize the seeding material, allowing it to
condense as aerosol in the jet contrail. The objective would not be to seed specific cloud systems but rather to build up
a background concentration of aerosol seeding material so that the air masses that cirrus will form in will contain the
appropriate amount of seeding material to produce larger ice crystals. 76
Among the chemtrail activists studying delivery systems, Harold Saive (chemtrailplanet.net)
is the most vociferous about a chemical system supplementary to fuel exhaust being necessary to
produce “persistent contrails (PC)” and the cirrus cloud cover that follows. Saive makes an
excellent point about why the possibility of this delivery system matters so much:
It’s important to keep in mind that aerosols intended for synthetic climate change, hurricane engineering (H.A.M.P.)
and most likely “biologicals” (Morgellons), are deployed with nozzles that have nothing to do with JP-8 fuel, contrails
or engine emissions. This explains why a gap between the engine and visible trail is created (albeit very short) when
77
water vapor is replaced by a vaporized chemical/metal like alumina.
Saive points to two recent Internet videos (and there are many others from years past at his
site) uploaded by Jörg Meiring of Maryland: “Jesus Christ help us please – LH501 Chemtrail-
78
Sprayer ‘Siegerflieger’” (February 5, 2017), taken by Meiring himself while a passenger on
79
Lufthansa; and “757 chemtrail filmed from cockpit” (February 26, 2017), uploaded by Meiring
but filmed by what appears to be an anonymous pilot. In an April 30, 2017 email, Saive
describes the cockpit observation thus:
Notice how the solid white line at the bottom of the trail is positioned where most drain tubes are typically mounted.
The remainder of the circumferential trail column is a function of turbofan and combustion exhaust turbidity that (in
this case) fails to completely capture and homogenize the flow from the drain tubes in order to simulate a water vapor
contrail. Notice how the trail becomes less dense as it approaches the top of the column, farthest from point of drain
tube injection. A minority of drain tubes mounted above the exhaust would be expected to exhibit differently.
The cockpit video clearly shows a smaller chemical trail threading beneath the larger, less