Page 44 - Elana Freeland - Under an Ionized Sky

defined engine exhaust. Critics may say this smaller trail could be a “cargo bay aerosol leak,” but
what if this “leak” is to supplement fuel emissions so as to super-saturate cloud condensation
nuclei (CCN), as was pointed out in an American Meteorological Society video presentation? 80
And what of the bifurcated trails and tw-engine aircraft leaving three trails? Drain tubes are often
conveniently located (even aftermarket re-engineered) inside the bypass duct so as to create the
illusion six miles below that all we are seeing is fuel combustion (pyrolysis) emissions.

Other inconsistencies that question a fuel-only chemical delivery:

• ​Sudden on-off trails

• ​Sputtering trails that eventually “go dry” with increasingly wider gaps
• ​Unique filament, “toothpaste,” and “knots on a rope” trails indicating varying
particulate ratios and chemical signatures
• ​Questionable volume and mass of single or intertwining aerosol plumes
• ​Observations of jets emitting NO trails
• ​Observations of starboard or port side emitting a different color (or even missing)
trail

So far, we’ve examined chemical delivery systems from the outside. Now, let’s look more
closely at what might be going on in the engine combustion chamber.

AIR PHARMACOLOGY II: SPRAY PYROLYSIS AND CHEMI-IONIZATION

In the December 6, 2001 issue of Columbus Alive, award-winning Ohio reporter Bob Fitrakis,
JD, revealed that according to two Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory scientists, two
separate projects in electromagnetic weather modification technology were being conducted at
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, one involving artificial Al O cloud cover creation to lessen
2 3
the effects of global warming, the other with barium stearate for over-the-horizon (OTH) military
communications, 3D mapping, and radar. 81
82
In his 2013 article “Wireless, Chemtrails, and You,” author William Thomas recounts the
early work of independent scientist Clifford Carnicom in northern New Mexico and wildlife
biologist Francis Mangels, Ph.D., in northern California. Beginning in 1999, Carnicom was
documenting high levels of reactive barium salts from aerosol grids over Santa Fe. By 2001,
barium levels had nearly doubled in California, despite the fact that industrial barium pollution
had all but vanished. With trees and fish dying, Mangels blamed aluminum oxide for soil pH
measuring 10X its normal alkalinity. In 2002, an Edmonton, Alberta, Canada landscaper was
seeing severe nutrient deficiencies (chlorosis) in flowers and trees; electrical conductivity
readings for soil should have been no higher than 1 but were showing 4.6 to 7X higher. Snow
samples confirmed elevated aluminum and barium. By 2008, a KSLA-sponsored lab test of
Louisiana precipitate found barium to be 6X the toxic level set by the EPA; in 2010, Arizona air
particulates of barium and aluminum skyrocketed: aluminum was 15.8X the toxic level, barium
5.3X. Carnicom has confirmed that the barium in our atmosphere is now 8X the level deemed
safe to breathe.