Page 156 - Elana Freeland - Under an Ionized Sky
P. 156
Rosalind Peterson (agriculturedefensecoalition.org) called public attention to the Charged
Aerosol Release Experiment (CARE) sponsored by the Naval Research Laboratory and
Department of Defense Space Test Program, laying out yet more artificial modification of the
81
space environment. To create artificial noctilucent (polar mesospheric) clouds in near-earth
orbit, rocket exhaust particles must be able to trigger an “artificial dust cloud.” Supposedly, the
dust particles are not released until the sounding rocket is 55+ miles (90+ km) above Earth, after
which they “settle back down to a lower altitude.” 82
Since the successful HAARP experiments and resurrection of the SDI Space Fence, seeding
the heated regions of the ionosphere with “dusty plasma” has been all the rage. Dusty plasma is
basically smart dust in space. As military and private rocket launches multiply to maintain a fleet
of 2,400–4,000 surveillance/communications satellites, each with a five-year lifespan, sounding
rockets are adding dusty plasma to the ring of conductive metal particulates settling around the
equator to facilitate high-speed global WiFi coverage from space, like NASA’s Orbiting
Rainbows Project that manipulates and controls orbiting engineered dust clouds with radio
frequency, optics, and microwaves
. . .to enable a new vision of space system architecture with applications to ultra-lightweight space optics and,
ultimately, in-situ space system fabrication. . .A cloud of highly reflective particles of micron size acting coherently in
a specific electromagnetic band, just like an aerosol in suspension in the atmosphere, would reflect the Sun’s light
much like a rainbow. 83
Reading between the lines of mainstream launch accounts makes it clear that contributing to
space environment modification is now the primary task of suborbital sounding rockets like
NASA’s Dynamo Project launch from Wallops Flight Facility on July 4, 2013 to study the
electrical current (dynamo) of the ionosphere as space scientist Robert Pfaff of NASA’s Goddard
Space Flight echoed Hess’ justification forty years earlier, this time by referencing dynamos on
Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. 84
In Chemtrails, HAARP, I discussed how draining the Van Allen Belts responsible for our
radiation shielding has always been a high priority for a functional Space Age—as important as
studying the planetary dynamo circuit. In 1996, the HiVOLT (High Voltage Orbiting Long
Tether) dynamo experiment failed—or did it? NASA’s story says it did:
The space tether experiment, a joint venture of the US and Italy, called for a scientific payload—a large, spherical
satellite—to be deployed from the US space shuttle at the end of a conducting cable (tether) 20 km (12.5 miles) long.
The idea was to let the shuttle drag the tether across the Earth›s magnetic field, producing one part of a dynamo
circuit. The return current, from the shuttle to the payload, would flow in the Earth›s ionosphere, which also
conducted electricity, even though not as well as the wire. . .the [experiment] on February 25, 1996, began as planned,
unrolling mile after mile of tether while the observed dynamo current grew at the predicted rate. The deployment was
almost complete when the unexpected happened: the tether suddenly broke and its end whipped way into space in
great wavy wiggles. The satellite payload at the far end of the tether remained linked by radio and was tracked for a
while, but the tether experiment itself was over. 85
HiVOLT was originally Russian physicist V.V. Danilov’s idea for draining the Van Allen
radiation belts around the Earth—our planetary shield now viewed by Space Age scientists as
keeping human beings from straying beyond their lower earth orbit (LEO). A charged tether
would change the pitch angle of charged particles and thus dissolve the offending inner Van
Allen belts.
So the tether broke after brief but direct “contact with the ionosphere,” and was swept up in
Earth’s orbit. Dutchsinse (Michael Janitch) in his June 22, 2015 YouTube revisit of the incident